Eighteen years have passed since the establishment of the California High Speed Rail (CHSR) Authority. Over the course of those eighteen years, high speed rail in the state has been discussed and planned and delayed and delayed more.
There have been proposals, referendums, debates, studies and budgets, but no tracks laid, no passengers queued, no trains roaring between Los Angeles and San Francisco in the promised three hour travel time at speeds exceeding 200 mph.
I began looking into the state of American high speed rail in pursuit of a few simple answers. Why don’t we have the sort of rail infrastructure seen across Europe, in Japan and now in China? What do proponents and opponents say about the various projects underway today? Put simply, what are the pros and cons of funding and maintaining high speed rail lines in this country, and what do our legislators make of them?
Read the complete story at www.attn.com.
Related News
- Andrew Fudge Wins SMART-TD Endorsement in Oregon House Race
- Federal Court Upholds 2-PC
- The fearmongering, speculation, and rhetoric stop now
- Preliminary Injunction Issued To SMART-TD Members On CSXT To Refrain From Self-Help
- He Never Asked for Help. That’s Why We Need to Show Up.
- Stand Beside Brother Dennis Mullen as He Fights for His Life
- Honoring Scott “Shoe” Shoemaker’s Legacy
- Moving Forward Together: A New Chapter for SMART Communications
- Should Truckers Speak for Railroaders?
- Union Sportsmen’s Alliance Celebrates 20 Years With 20 Benelli M2 Shotguns