By Retired GS&T Dan Johnson
In the January issue of UTU News, the two-page centerfold summarized provisions of the Railway Labor Act.
In the February issue, I explained how the Railway Labor Act is purposely designed to encourage both sides to reach a mutually acceptable solution that keeps the trains running.
In the March issue, I discussed the role of the National Mediation Board and the value of joint labor-management problem solving at the negotiating table, which is called “interest-based bargaining.”
After several years of unfruitful hostile bargaining by the previous administration, International President Mike Futhey used interest-based bargaining in January 2008 to reach a national agreement with the major railroads — an agreement overwhelmingly ratified by our membership.
With the national contract again open for amendment, President Futhey and the UTU national contract negotiating team are again pursuing interest-based bargaining with the carriers to produce a contract beneficial to both sides.
Successful joint problem solving requires that both sides understand the needs of the other.
Labor’s challenge in interest-based bargaining is to have a solid understanding of carrier economics. It is not good enough to say we simply want something, because that list is endless.
Related News
- Andrew Fudge Wins SMART-TD Endorsement in Oregon House Race
- Federal Court Upholds 2-PC
- The fearmongering, speculation, and rhetoric stop now
- Preliminary Injunction Issued To SMART-TD Members On CSXT To Refrain From Self-Help
- He Never Asked for Help. That’s Why We Need to Show Up.
- Stand Beside Brother Dennis Mullen as He Fights for His Life
- Honoring Scott “Shoe” Shoemaker’s Legacy
- Moving Forward Together: A New Chapter for SMART Communications
- Should Truckers Speak for Railroaders?
- Union Sportsmen’s Alliance Celebrates 20 Years With 20 Benelli M2 Shotguns