The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday heard oral arguments in a case that could invalidate hundreds of National Labor Relations Board rulings and set the agency back more than a year in its workload if it loses.
The dispute could also determine when presidents can use so-called “recess appointments” to fill key positions that generally require Senate approval, creating serious implications for the White House.
Read the complete story at The Washington Post.
Related News
- Andrew Fudge Wins SMART-TD Endorsement in Oregon House Race
- Federal Court Upholds 2-PC
- The fearmongering, speculation, and rhetoric stop now
- Preliminary Injunction Issued To SMART-TD Members On CSXT To Refrain From Self-Help
- He Never Asked for Help. That’s Why We Need to Show Up.
- Stand Beside Brother Dennis Mullen as He Fights for His Life
- Honoring Scott “Shoe” Shoemaker’s Legacy
- Moving Forward Together: A New Chapter for SMART Communications
- Should Truckers Speak for Railroaders?
- Union Sportsmen’s Alliance Celebrates 20 Years With 20 Benelli M2 Shotguns